Special rules for allied offenders

The British marine who struck an assistant police officer in Tallinn last year is the first allied soldier in whose case Estonia decided not to implement its laws. The decision is tied to guarantees in allied soldiers' contracts, and the public prosecutor's office has completed a set of guidelines for dealing with relevant cases in the future.

„We will surrender our jurisdiction in a lot of cases,“ Attorney General Lavly Perling said with a measure of concern. This means that should allied soldiers break the law in Estonia, they will generally be tried in their home country and according to its laws.

Let it be said that Perling's concern is not due to allies being prone to offenses or the risk of them going unpunished.

A soldier's guarantee

Procedures that are applicable in cases where allied soldiers commit offenses are regulated by the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). Estonia also has special agreements with two members – Germany and USA – that lay down an even clearer procedure. A lot of items in these agreements function as guarantees for soldiers.

„To put it simply, they do have preferential right, which is how it should be,“ Perling said. „It is important for Estonia to be able to explain why we surrender evidence or why accused will not be tried for serious offenses in Estonia in certain cases.“

Public prosecutor Piret Paukštys explained that allied soldiers and civilian personnel in Estonia are under two simultaneous jurisdictions.

Allied countries have preferential right concerning offenses that take place inside their armed forces: for example when a soldier attacks a fellow serviceman or woman or destroys their country's property.

Also crimes committed in the line of duty. However, when the victim is the Estonian state, citizen, or a person residing in Estonia, Estonia has priority of jurisdiction.

While the police can conduct proceedings and collect evidence if already on the scene, evidence needs to be surrendered to the offender's home country later should it have first jurisdictional right.

Agreements tend to favor going outside of Estonian jurisdiction. Allies can simply ask for jurisdiction to be surrendered.

Paukštys said that she perceives a problem in the fact that allied soldiers who commit offenses generally spend a short time in Estonia. „Perhaps they're here for six months after which they're gone. However, a person has to be present for procedural acts and to be prosecuted here. It might be more practical to hand these things over in some cases,“ she said.

In cases where the injured party is from Estonia, the latter must have dealings with a foreign country and attend court sittings there. Here lies the core of the prosecution's concern: how to make sure interests of victims are always protected?

„I would proceed based on the victim's interests,“ Paukštys recommended. For example in cases where victims have a financial claim against an allied soldier, prosecutors should refuse to surrender jurisdiction.

If the aforesaid concerns the NATO SOFA agreement that regulates the presence of British, French, Danish, and Spanish soldiers currently in Estonia, rules are even more slanted toward contributing countries in the case of Germany and the United States.

Right to be reclaimed

Estonia signed a corresponding agreement with Germany in 2007 and with the U.S. in January this year.

Both agreements include a promise by Estonia not to process offenses by allied soldiers even in cases where the SOFA agreement would warrant it. Estonia will automatically surrender jurisdiction and hand over the investigation.

For example, in cases where a U.S. soldier causes a traffic accident in which people get hurt in Estonia, the matter will be heard by a U.S. court-martial.

„Yes, we surrender jurisdiction automatically; however, we have the possibility of taking it back in special cases within 21 days,“ head of the legal department of the defense ministry Kalle Kirss explained.

This right would not be exercised in case of traffic accidents or battery but would apply to severe offenses against persons, like murder and rape.

„We do not have the right to take back jurisdiction concerning offenses committed in the line of duty. There the U.S. has exclusive jurisdiction,“ Kirss said. Whether the offender was performing service tasks when the crime was committed is for their local commander to determine.

Reclamation of property damage is also different under SOFA rules. Damage caused to the Estonian Defense Forces by allied armed forces in the course of performing service tasks will not be reclaimed. Other damage to state property will not be reclaimed if the damage is below $1,400. Damage caused to third persons in the line of duty will be compensated by the Estonian Defense Forces.

Even though these conditions might seem quite one-sided, Kirss said they have their reasons. The idea of SOFA is to protect soldiers in countries punishments of which might be disproportionally severe compared to the soldier's home country. Estonia has similar agreements in place in various conflict zones.

When the U.S. ratified the SOFA agreement decades ago, the Congress made it clear mutual additional agreements would be needed to protect American soldiers. The first such agreement was signed between USA and the Netherlands in the 1960s. Today USA has similar agreements in place with Poland, Germany, Italy, and the three Baltic countries.

Kirss said that the agreement signed on January 9 was not irreciprocal as the Americans met Estonia half way in several areas. The country adopted the obligation to preserve Estonia's national environment during training activities as well as pay for transport of soldiers to be tried in Estonia. Kirss said there is no reason to fear victims' interests going unprotected. „I believe we should not worry overmuch. People who commit crimes will be punished through the court-martials system,“ Kirss said.

postimees
defenceforce law NATO prosecutor soldier
If you notice an error, highlight the text you want and press Ctrl + Enter to report it to the editor
I recommend
No recommendations yet

Comments

Post your comment to communicate and discuss this article.

Politics
Chairman of the Estonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and one of the owners of construction group Nordecon, Toomas Luman, finds that a prime ministerial candidate should first and foremost be able to answer the question of what will become of the demographic crisis in Estonia. The businessman sees controlled introduction of foreign labor as the solution. A digital construction cluster was created in Estonia a few years back to bring innovation to the s...
Society
Last year saw 27,125 registered offenses, up 0.5 percent from the year before. Violent crime was up by 12 percent to 8,249 offenses. PHOTO: Dominic Lipinski / PA Wire / Press Association Images / Scanpix Growth was biggest for domestic violence – the police launched criminal proceedings in 3,607 cases that constitutes an increase of more than one-third – annual growth of 37 percent from 2,632 cases in 2017. At the same time, reports of domestic violence we...
Society
TALLINN - Ahead of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, tens of thousands of British citizens have chosen the citizenship of some other country, but only one Brit has recently chosen an Estonian citizenship. Spokespeople for the Ministry of the Interior told BNS that only one British citizen submitted an application for Estonian citizenship last year and the applicant was also granted the citizenship. Before that, no Brits had soug...
Society
TALLINN - Experts from Finland, Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands highlighted the importance of decentralization and granting local governments greater decision-making powers at a conference titled "Strong local government -- strong state?" in Tallinn on Wednesday.  All Nordic countries have chosen a model granting local governments significant decision-making powers, thus the central government does not prescribe how local governments are to fulfill the...
Society
The language learning application Drops by game developer Planb Labs, established in Estonia by Hungarian founders, was named Google Play's best app of 2018. With the number of downloads surpassing 10 million, Drops was named Google's app of the year as the revenue of Planb Labs, a company registered in Estonia, increased fivefold, CNBC said. The developer's revenue grew from €335,000 in 2017 to €1.7 million in 2018. The company's shareholders include Hung...
Society
TALLINN - The Estonian Health Board has banned the distribution of chlorine dioxide, also marketed as the Miracle Mineral Supplement (MMS), the A-component of an unused product, meaning the sodium chlorite solution, must be taken to a hazardous waste collection facility. Ester Opik, head of the Health Board's North regional department, said that the banning of the distribution of the product was caused by the fact that MMS, distributed as a cosmetics produ...
Society
Nature cannot abide a vacancy, as the saying goes. If just one year ago, Estonia was battling the sale of MMS and the practice of giving it to children, a new “miracle cure” called Advanced TRS has appeared on the market now. Even though the make-up of the substance is different, the promise to cure autism and cleanse the body of heavy metals, which kind of extreme detox is accompanied by severe side-effects, sounds all too familiar. TRS is recommended to...
Society
Allied NATO battalions will soon mark two years serving in the Baltics. They have worked better than expected but would need prepositioned heavy weaponry and a functional contingency plan in case of a crisis, a report by the International Center for Defense and Security (ICDS) finds. “We do not know how Russia would have acted had we not welcomed allies in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland in 2017. I’m afraid they would have tested our resolve,” one of...
Society
The time of filing income tax returns is nearly upon us. The new income tax system, in effect since last year, will obligate many women who went on maternity leave toward the end of the year to make additional income tax payments, while those who give birth in the middle or at the beginning of the year have no such obligation. What this means is that some women will owe the state simply for giving birth “at the wrong time”. Laura Roop, who went on maternit...